Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #2: Would you vote for repealing the present Universal Background Check legislation that now controls the private exchange of firearms in Vermont?
Desired Response = YES |
| Answer: YES |
Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #3: Would you vote to repeal the restriction on the purchase of firearms by persons under the age of 21?
Desired Response = YES |
| Answer: YES |
Explanation: We need to have one age, you are or not an adult, with all the rights and responsibilities that entails. If you can be drafted for war at 18, you should be able to drink a beer or smoke, also own a gun.
|
Question #4: Would you vote to repeal the restrictions on ammunition feeding devices (magazines) that hold more than 10 rounds for rifles and 15 rounds for pistols?
Desired Response = YES |
| Answer: YES |
Explanation: This law makes no sense, Gov. Scott had a chance to bring Vt together to show bi-partisan legislation, but he signed this one that makes no sense, no sense at all.
|
Question #5: Would you vote to repeal the prohibition on the possession and sale of “bump stocks?”
Desired Response = YES |
| Answer: YES |
Explanation: Again, a law that means nothing, because you can make something on your own for less than $5 that does the same thing. Dumb law.
|
Question #6: Would you vote to prohibit sale and possession of semi-automatic firearms?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #7: Would you vote to prohibit the sale and possession of semi-automatic rifles that are styled to resemble military “assault rifles”, such as the AR-15 and AK-47?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #8: Would you vote to prohibit the sale and use of lead ammunition?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: From an enviromental standpoint it would be good to come up with alternatives. Lead is a nasty substance. I would encourage the development of other projectiles.
|
Question #9: Would you vote for mandatory state licensing for persons to possess/carry firearms?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #10: Would you vote for mandatory state registration of all firearms?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #11: Would you vote for a mandatory waiting period before the transfer of a firearm can be completed?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #12: Would you vote for a mandatory “safe storage” law that requires privately owned firearms to be kept locked in a cabinet, separate from ammunition, or partially disassembled?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: Using common sense and keeping guns away from irresponsible or people who aren't mature enough would be a good practice at home.
|
Question #13: Would you vote to make it illegal to possess firearms in a place that has a liquor license?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: They have socialists pushing this in Burlington, it makes no sense, it's a state and USA right protected by the Constitutions.
|
Question #14: Would you vote to allow the state or its municipalities to designate “gun free zones” in which citizens may not lawfully carry a firearm?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: Are we to have free speech zones? Where people are not free to speak? How many rights do people want to take away? These designated zones are absurd. We need to be educating our youth in why the US Constitution is such a wonderful document. These officials who vote this way are derelict in their sworn duties.
|
Question #15: Would you vote to enact civil penalties and/or fines, for towns that violate the Sportsman’s Bill of Rights (1988)?
Desired Response = YES |
| Answer: YES |
Explanation: Towns should not be able to pass rule, regulations that go against a constitutional right. There should be no areas that prohibit the firing of a weapon, how would police function, how could one defend oneself? There is a multifacted attack upon our rights.
With the limited knowledge, I believe the state has authorization on these items as it should be. I would vote yes to enact civil penalties and probably more. One of the cleaver things being done to take away property rights, and personal rights is to try an act local regulations that go against the constitution. liberties and/or commons sense.
|
Question #16: Would you vote to allow a person to possess, carry, or use a gun suppressor for any legitimate purpose?
Desired Response = YES |
| Answer: YES |
Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #17: Would you vote to expunge the criminal records of non-violent prohibited persons, to recover their Constitutional rights, if they have demonstrated good behavior and responsibility for a number of years?
Desired Response = YES |
| Answer: YES |
Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #18: Would you vote to allow firearm safety training in public schools?
Desired Response = YES |
| Answer: YES |
Explanation: No additional comment.
|
Question #19: Would you support decisions to have armed guards, and/or properly trained faculty and staff, in public schools and colleges?
Desired Response = YES |
| Answer: YES |
Explanation: Yes I would support if should people choose this. I do not believe this is the answer, however. The violence, hopelessness and frustration is in the young student. In every high school they already know who the school shooter is going to be. As in the past we need to be working with discipline, love and proper guidance so the young people know...who the next shooter is, all the teachers and guidance counselors know who it is. We used to have reform schools. We have a great program in Vermont, True North & Steve Harvey has a great program. Both of these change family dynamics in a short period of time and have a wonderful track record. We are leaving our young men out to dry. We are not equipping people to deal with life’s’ challenges, which were taught for decades. We are not looking at what has caused the violence, what and why it has changed in society. The two solutions do not address it, while one does offer some semblance of protection, so the problem won’t be solved because it’s not even being addressed. The violence and why it’s present needs to be addressed. We are facing (VT) and in DCF particularly, issues that are in other countries and societies, when certain well intended plans are adopted, but these plans result in terrible, predictable reactions. It’s a bigger problem than this question a lots for space.
|
Question #20: Would you vote to prohibit possession of firearms by persons whose names appear on a government-generated watch-list of persons deemed “ineligible” to possess firearms? If so, using what criteria?
Desired Response = NO |
| Answer: NO |
Explanation: I am very cautious about any lists, of which are frequently used to do something else than what was stated. Perhaps I don't know enough about this topic. What is a watch list?
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |